What are the critical concepts emphasized in Graham vs. Connor regarding police use of force?

The case of Graham vs. Connor is pivotal in establishing the standards regarding the use of force by police officers. The critical concept emphasized in this case is the "reasonable and necessary use of force." The ruling established that the appropriateness of force must be assessed through the perspective of a reasonable officer on the scene, taking into account the situation as it appeared at that moment. This means that law enforcement officers are allowed to use force that is proportional and necessary to address the threat or resistance they encounter, rather than any arbitrary measure of force.

The emphasis on "reasonable" indicates that the use of force is to be objectively assessed and must align with what a reasonable officer would do under similar circumstances, factoring in the urgency and dynamics of the situation they are facing. Therefore, this principle shapes how law enforcement agencies formulate policies on use of force, ensuring that actions are justified by the need to protect themselves or others, rather than resulting from excessive or unwarranted aggression.